Category: Emergency Management

  • Strengthened Aged Care Quality Standards

    Strengthened Aged Care Quality Standards

    The Strengthened Aged Care Quality Standards mark a significant shift in the way aged care services are regulated and delivered in Australia. With a stronger emphasis on safety, dignity, and accountability, providers must now implement more rigorous care practices while maintaining operational efficiency.

    For many aged care providers, these changes represent both an opportunity and a challenge. How can organisations ensure compliance while continuing to provide high-quality, person-centred care? That’s where RiskLogic comes in—helping aged care facilities embrace these reforms with confidence and resilience.

    Breaking Down the Strengthened Standards

    The updated standards demand higher levels of accountability and focus on key areas, including:

    Dignity and Personalised Care

    Ensuring that aged care recipients receive respectful and customised care plans.

    Quality & Safety in Service Delivery

    Strengthening clinical governance, risk oversight, and infection control measures.

    Workforce Development & Training

    Raising the bar for aged care staff qualifications and ongoing education.

    Organisational Transparency & Governance

    Holding leadership accountable for ethical and compliant operations.

    Providers must now proactively align their systems, training, and processes with these new expectations to avoid compliance risks and potential penalties.

    Strategic Steps to Compliance: RiskLogic’s Role

    RiskLogic works closely with aged care providers to streamline their compliance journey, providing strategic guidance and practical solutions. Here’s how we support organisations:

    Developing Resilient Operational Frameworks

    Changes in regulation often require adjustments to internal policies and procedures. RiskLogic assists in establishing governance structures, quality control mechanisms, and risk management frameworks that align with the revised standards.

    Aligning Policies and Procedures with Compliance Requirements

    We help organisations ensure that their internal policies reflect the new aged care quality standards.

    Enhancing Staff Capabilities Through Training

    With a greater emphasis on workforce competence, our targeted training programs and scenario-based learning modules equip aged care teams with the knowledge and confidence to meet compliance requirements.

    Building a Culture of Continuous Learning

    RiskLogic helps aged care providers foster an ongoing learning environment, ensuring staff stay up to date with regulatory requirements.

    Strengthening Incident Response & Crisis Management

    In an environment where service disruptions can have serious consequences, being prepared is non-negotiable. We help organisations establish clear crisis response protocols, ensuring they can handle critical situations effectively while maintaining service continuity.

    Proactive Crisis Management for Aged Care Providers

    Our resilience solutions ensure aged care facilities remain operational even during unexpected disruptions.

    Why RiskLogic?

    We understand that compliance is not just about ticking boxes—it’s about fostering a culture of safety, accountability, and resilience. Our expertise in aged care governance, risk mitigation, and operational continuity ensures that providers are not just meeting the standards but exceeding them.

    Take Action Today

    The transition to the Strengthened Aged Care Quality Standards doesn’t have to be overwhelming. With RiskLogic’s expert guidance, your organisation can navigate these changes efficiently while maintaining a high level of care for residents and clients.

    Let’s ensure your aged care service is compliant, resilient, and prepared for the future. Get in touch with RiskLogic today to explore how we can support your journey to compliance and operational excellence.

     

  • The Question Isn’t Can You Exercise, It’s Will You?

    The Question Isn’t Can You Exercise, It’s Will You?

    Over the past few years, RiskLogic has gained a reputation for providing truly unique and dynamic exercise simulations for organisations wishing to test their Business Continuity Program & resilience. Being able to understand how your team works when the pressure is on is vital, but being able to identify gaps and roadblocks that can occur during a crisis, probably more so.

    Recently, RiskLogic sat down with Therese Chakour-West, the Information Technology Manager at STIHL Pty Ltd (STIHL) to revisit her experience in developing and validating a Business Continuity Plan (BCP) and attending an exercise.

    STIHL established its name in the forestry and landscape world as far back as the mid 20’s. Today, they are now considered as the pioneers to petrol powered chainsaws and one of the most established brands in the market. Their chainsaws, handheld equipment, and tools are likely to be sitting in most handyman’s vans. When Mr. Andreas Stihl founded his company in 1926, it was unlikely he was considering the importance of a BC plan and running scenario exercises however. So why is it today, in 2016, a large majority still haven’t acted on putting something in place?

    Therese and her team are considered as early adopters in this case. They saw a need for a review and action before anything serious happened, and this was endorsed by the parent company’s auditors!

    “We’ve not had a BCP at all before, so that was an obvious key driver. We identified a serious gap for the operation and we had to act on it. The auditors asked for things like the Disaster Recovery Plan (DRP) and we didn’t have any plan to show them! They really applied the pressure, so we had to get something done and it was our responsibility to do so for our own subsidiary.”

    It’s no myth that directors, CEO’s and Senior execs are being spoken to all the time about BCP’s and risks that the organisation faces. A key challenge is convincing them of the importance but then getting it underway.

    “I had been trying to get it off the ground for many years. The previous MD didn’t quite see the value but with the auditor’s support and the current Leadership team support, I knew I could finally get something done here. The interest was already there for the DRP, but it was also the BCP we had to align. You can’t have one without the other. So, I just took it upon myself to get it done. You know, it’s funny, when I met with the Chairman of the board in July, I told him what we had done with the exercises, the DRP & BCP and this convinced him enough to report the importance of them back to the parent company and other subsidiaries. He just got that we needed to do it.”

    When you are part of a very large organisation, it is easy to forget that many areas of the business have different risks compared to that of head office. Therese understood quickly that their plan had to be different.

    it was getting the guidance to put a plan that worked into action

    “The parent company in Germany had their DR plan and it seemed obvious to use theirs. It didn’t take long to realise we had our own risks to focus on though. So, our procurement manager went to market and we found RiskLogic. That final BCP couldn’t have been handed down, it had to be unique for our three sites, it had to focus on our needs”.

    “We’re a team of four full-timers here on the IT Crisis team (7 total members on the crisis team). It was a no-brainer to all of us we needed this in place, but it was getting the guidance to put a plan that worked into action”.

    Those organisations that do not have a plan in place often ask themselves the same question, ‘what do we actually do if something happens?’ Most businesses will encounter at least 17,000 different versions and types of incident events each year (mostly small cyber attacks that fail); a vast majority of those will not have a BCP in place to deal with it.

    “I asked myself that a few years back; if we have a crisis, what do we do? Who does what? Really, when you’re in that high-intensity situation – what are you going to do? We really were flying by the seat of our pants here”.

    RiskLogic’s exercises focus on testing a business continuity program via realistic, hands-on scenario exercises. This is critical to:

    1) Build familiarisation with staff roles, responsibilities, processes and available tools

    2) Identify practical program improvements

    3) Provide a high level of stakeholder assurance in an organisations recovery capability

    At RiskLogic, we create event-driven, realistic scenario exercises, maximising participant engagement and providing a comprehensive, yet practical learning experience. We’ll even provide a Client with highly dynamic scenarios, utilising well-established exercise resources in a controlled exercise environment.

    Over the last two years, we have run over 150 exercises and trained over 7,000 people on Business Continuity. A number of those organisations later went on to have a real life situation occur. They were able to successfully implement the plan they had originally rehearsed to deal with the situation.

    Therese reiterated the importance of this, “You know, I’m keen to get these happening annually! Keeping the team refreshed because there is a lot of information, just keeping that awareness there”.

    you get out and act and this simulation really showed the dynamics

     

    “The scenario was a real eye-opener for us; it was unanimous. You’re really put under the same pressure you would get in real life. We were getting emails, phone calls and you know you really are just winging it by that stage.”

    “I actually got a phone call from ‘The Herald Sun’ and thought what am I supposed to say to them? I actually put my foot in it and it was a huge surprise there. You don’t think that an emergency you’re dealing with could be going viral on social media, and that can really hurt the brand.”

    “I also noticed we needed a lot of focus on the ground level people. Who is going to check on our staff?  Do we know who on the crisis team should focus on our people and where they should be based? Do you stay in the office while all this happens? No, you get out and act and this simulation really showed the dynamics we can provide as a small team, it was really great”.

    Recently, a pastor who had eaten at an Applebee’s restaurant in the US crossed out the automatic ‘18% tip charged’ for parties of more than eight and wrote “I give God 10% why do you get 18” above her signature. A waitress at the restaurant took a photo of this and posted it online. She was subsequently fired for “violating customer privacy” which would have been understandable if Applebee’s had not posted a similar receipt that was complimenting them just 2 weeks prior.

    As news of this incident spread like wildfire and infuriated people across all social media platforms, Applebee’s responded with a short post defending their actions on their Facebook page. This quickly drew over 10,000 mostly negative comments, to which Applebee’s started responding by posting the same comment over and over again. They were also accused of deleting negative comments and blocking users.

    The downward spiral continued as Applebee’s persisted in defending their actions and argued with users that criticised them. By the following day, after the original post had generated over 19,000 comments, Applebee’s decided to hide the post which only created more anger.

    “Gosh, you just shouldn’t underestimate the importance of this. People, customers talking about your brand without you being aware could be so damaging. There is so much at stake” Therese acknowledged when we mentioned a similar example.

    Since their scenario exercise with RiskLogic in June 2016, Therese is initiating an awareness session with the wider team. Her three other locations throughout Australia will adopt the same processes to ensure everyone, everywhere, is prepared – especially their Primary Crisis Team working out of the command centre in Melbourne. This is a fantastic step for STIHL to promote their resilience and innovative nature in the market, but maybe more so having the ability to show their staff and clients they care about this subject!

    “I have so much more to learn, I’m no Crisis Management expert but I definitely feel more confident in my team and our readiness when the pressure is on”.

    To learn more about STIHL and their work, visit Stihl.com.au

    For daily updates, follow my twitter or our facebook pages now!

    Until then, plan, do, check & act…

    Contact Us today to learn more

  • How to Avoid the Auckland Fuel Crisis Reoccuring

    How to Avoid the Auckland Fuel Crisis Reoccuring

    An overview

    In mid-September this year, Auckland went through a serious event that involved a major fuel line at Auckland International Airport being damaged. The result of this was city and nationwide frustration on a steady ripple effect of issues caused by the lack of fuel.

    Whilst most businesses could operate as normal, there have certainly been some interesting developments and issues surrounding what we did about it.

    RiskLogic spent some time recently pulling the facts on this crisis.

     Overview of stats:

    • Suspected digger driver/contractor tears main fuel line in Northland.
    • Airlines reduced to 30% of fuel.
    • Thousands miss key flights and connections internationally.
    • Government warned of potential risks back in 2010.
    • Supply chain issues and preparation to blame.

    A Summary: What happened in Auckland?

    The leak, caused by a one-man digger 8km south of Marsden Point oil refinery in Northland, was discovered last Thursday. At the time, it was expected to affect about 2000 travellers a day as jet fuel is rationed.

    The 130km pipeline resulted in airlines being restricted to only 30% of fuel allowance per trip. This meant most international flights were cancelled over that weekend.

    Fuel Industry spokesman, Andrew McNaughton said on the 19th of September that “we are certainly taking up the Governments offer of the Navy vessel that can distribute diesel…as well as their technical expertise”, suggesting that the Fuel Industry didn’t have this in place, to begin with.

    Four of the Z Fuel stations in Auckland were out of their 95 Premium gas after 24 hours due to the delays.

    More than 30 flights, including 12 international trips, were cancelled on the Tuesday morning. By the Wednesday, thousands of passengers were planning for rescheduled flights with hundreds of complaints and communication issues streaming into Auckland Airport operations.

    “As with any spill, the regional council is investigating the circumstances leading up to it and will consider what, if any, further action is appropriate in due course”.

    A spokesperson for Northland Regional Council said most swamp kauri extraction on farmland (area of the incident) in Northland did not require resource consent from the regional council, and none had been issued for the area where the pipe was damaged.

    “However, the council stresses any such action is currently secondary to its primary focus; ensuring the appropriate recovery of the spilt fuel and clean-up of the site.”

    It was reported that 80,000 litres of fuel were spilt at the Ruakaka (roughly two tankers worth) but the council confirmed no waterways were affected.

    How were businesses affected?

    The most affected organisations seemed to be Auckland’s daily airline providers and the Government. In 2012, National were warned of the vulnerability of this fuel line, however, Bill English (New Zealand Prime Minister) said the arrangements of this fuel line was between the fuel companies and airlines.

    Labour leader Jacinda Ardern used this as an opportunity to comment on the Governments lack of infrastructure and plans to New Zealand businesses.

    When discussing the impacts and looking for an update from our Auckland based client Rakon, Andre Greissner Engineering Manager, Equipment’s & Facilities mentioned that although their organisation was not affected, it was a big wake up call to the massive impacts it could have had.

    “We’ve had exactly the same issue five years ago. Two weeks [of] total gas outage in the city because the only pipeline got damage in a mudslide. And that was known to be a serious threat too, for years”.

    Locals in Ruakaka mentioned to NewsHub reporters that they had seen multiple diggers in this location as far back as 2011. Trees, swamps and new lines have been removed in this location over the years.

    It was reported that only 12 local Auckland businesses were temporally closed during the crisis. All of these businesses were in some way related to the aviation industry and none were closed more than 48 hours after the event.

    What key lessons can we learn?

    Interestingly, around the time of this event occurring, RiskLogic was meeting with our partners Aon to understand the concerns around contractors on site for our clients:

    • Are these contractors briefed?
    • Do they know the precautions your staff usually take?
    • Yes, they understand basic health & safety, but are they aware of possible major impacts to your business?

    During our training session with the Greater Wellington Regional Council this month, we identified that on many occasions for New Zealand organisations, contractors are frequently on site. More and more organisations are outsourcing, that’s not unusual and can be a very efficient way of delivering a key business function.

    As an organisation, you should consider a few things about your supply change or contractor:

    • How effective and prepared is my supply chain?
    • How briefed are our contractors?
    • Could we afford complete downtime/offline mode for more than 24 hours as a result of something our contractors did?

    The argument between the fuel lines contractors and the public is that a local farmer caused this event. The public, especially locals refuse to believe this as most media outlets are blaming the contractor. Its not uncommon to see finger pointing and passing the buck. However, as I’ve stated before if you were effected by this event and it resulted in an interruption to your services (whatever that might be), to your key stakeholders, the responsibility still lies with you. You have to have a contingency to deal with this.

    The key lesson here is that your resilience plan should cross all areas of operation, including contractors and supply chain.

    What can you do today to ensure you’re better prepared if something like this happens again?

    • If you’ve got a Business Impact Analysis (BIA) time to dust it off and check your critical functions and what are the external dependencies. What does the delivery of those functions rely on from an external party:
    • Name of the third party, do they still exist?
    • Who is the primary contact?
    • Have they got up-to-date site clearance?
    • What is their level of resilience. Have they got a plan, have the validated it?
    • If you haven’t got a BIA – get one.Think of some scenarios that may affect your external party and ask them how they would respond:
      • Another fuel crisis
      • A city-wide weather event, closing roads
      • Major power loss
      • Earthquake
      • Cyber event
    • Create a desktop exercise to test your internal procedures, invite your contractors or supply chain to attend.

    How we can all avoid it happening again?

    Your Business Impact Analysis (BIAs) should be able to identify the potential risks and threats that may eventuate for your organisation. If fuel crisis isn’t on there, then it might be worth adding it. Both the Fuel and Aviation industry should have identified this event to be a potential risk back in 2011, but as no one wants to take the blame now, neither have proved they did.

    Make sure you are not caught out by someone else’s shortcomings. You can get on top of this by taking a look at your current BIA today!

    As I write this article we have seen yet another example of 3rd party and supply chain disruption causing a major outage, check out my defence force article here: http://risklogic.co.nz/how-the-defense-force-was-hacked/ 

    Until next time, Plan, Do, Check and Act…

    Contact Us today to learn more

  • Is Your Business Ready For The FENZ Emergency Scheme?

    Is Your Business Ready For The FENZ Emergency Scheme?

    One year in for New Zealand’s updated fire and emergency regulations (FENZE Scheme & Procedure), how confident are you that your business has the right emergency procedures in place?

    Evacuation schemes and procedures

    As of 1 July 2018, most New Zealand buildings must by law have an approved and managed evacuation scheme or procedure. The exceptions are residential homes or complexes with three or fewer household units.

    This is the result of a new regulation under the Fire & Emergency NZ (FENZ) Act and, although not as in-depth as our neighbouring Australia’s regulations, the new requirements are still causing some confusion for organisations and businesses trying to stay compliant.

    There is particular confusion amongst businesses around whether an evacuation scheme or procedure is neededThe diagram below sheds some light.

    FENZ Regulation Evacutaion and procedure scheme diagram

    Other changes under the new regulation include:

    • colour and layout of building fire action notices
    • fire-fighting equipment for older buildings
    • new application deadlines and requirements for FENZ approval
    • adjustment to evacuation schemes or the power to revoke by FENZ
    • changes in trial evacuations
    • requirements for building owners to notify FENZ of certain events.

    Although NZ’s commercial and industrial safety history is good, many have failed to adjust to and maintain these requirements. Those who have, however, have seen a positive response during insurance renewal periods, as well as quicker adjustments to new premises they’ve obtained.

    Lockdown and shelter in place

    Whilst every site must now have an evacuation procedure, this still leaves questions around the latest concerns: lockdown and shelter in place (ie, the opposite of evacuation).

    Many industrial outfits close to Christchurch airport were put into lockdown immediately after the Christchurch attack on 15 March—a seemingly unlikely event for these businesses. One confirmed armed police prowling their loading docks, creating panic for staff and stakeholders on the business’s preparedness.

    With growing focus on this new threat to New Zealand, businesses are assessing which staff need detailed training, how they maintain a programme, and how they align this to the updated evacuation requirements.

    Mix in the issue of sending mass-communications for businesses with staff out in the field and on the move, and it can all seem overwhelming.

    Plan, do, check & act…

    Instead of worrying about the multitude of emergency events that could occur, take a practical look at your current processes. You’ll get a good idea of where you’re at by following these four steps: Plan, Do, Check & Act.

    As an organisation, our client, Master Plumbers has taken this advice seriously and has begun a new programme with RiskLogic in 2019. By following the programme, Master Plumbers will develop a comprehensive crisis management plan and training for its newly-formed crisis management team in Wellington.

    A full programme looks to increase their preparedness and capability across three levels of coordinated response:

    • Tactical: First responders, wardens and emergency services—building capability to ensure people and assets are protected.
    • Operational: Reducing the impact to critical business functions during a business interruption.
    • Strategic: Delivering a strategic incident response to protect the Master Plumbers brand and reputation.

    The next phase of the journey looks to put the team through a scenario exercise to validate the crisis plan and team.

    You can look to implement a similar program today by contacting us.

  • No Smoke Without Fire: The Auckland NZICC Crisis

    No Smoke Without Fire: The Auckland NZICC Crisis

    At approximately 1pm on Tuesday the 22nd of October, a fire started in the (still under construction) 700 million-dollar New Zealand International Convention Centre (NZICC).

    Although the investigation into how and why the fire started could take up to another two weeks, it’s been alleged that a junior contract construction worker left a blow torch on while heading outside for a cigarette. This has caused an estimated 250 million-dollar of damage.

    Many media reports have collated and shared a bombardment of inadequate statements, unconfident strategies and blame games by key stakeholders from all parties.

    This event caused a considerable amount of disruption to the Auckland CBD – closing many businesses, stopping public transport and closing shops & cafes in the surrounding streets for up to three days.

    Insurance companies are hindering the investigation and causing extra disruption while many are now in the process of reviewing premiums and terms of those connected to the convention centre. The outlook is bleak for these however as in some premiums, the terms rarely state coverage for another businesses fault.

    So, the question we must ask ourselves when an incident like this occurs is one; do we have Emergency Management procedures in place to mitigate this? Do we have Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) to protect our people and our places, our building, facilitates and our assets against predictable events?

    Are our plans up to date and have they been tested and validated? Are they in line with current Fire & Emergency regulation as well? The FENZ Scheme & Procedures are a new regulation from 2018 which will likely be more prominent to leaderships teams after the investigation is concluded.

    This scheme is designed to have audited processes in place to help people in scenarios exactly like this. It would appear that this didn’t happen in the case of the NZICC.

    RiskLogic follows these regulations very closely, maybe even more so since the merger with First 5 Group (who are leading experts in the Emergency Management space across Australia & New Zealand). We’ve seen an alarming number of organisations not keep up to speed with regulations like this and not testing their plans.

    Secondly; do we have good crisis management training in place which will help our people to effectively respond to these incidents? If we look at case studies from the Convention Centre fire, many employees have disclosed that managers “told them to carry on working” as smoke began to creep its way into their office.

    This tells us that perhaps the smaller, less mature businesses have not looked at crisis training whatsoever.

    Whatever the case, we need to be trained and drilled, we need to have thought about how we respond as an organisation and look at the environment our organisation (and people) are in. What makes your business exempt to training and validating plans? Just because you’re not SpaceX or Military, you should be doing this.

    Thirdly; do we have business continuity plans in place (BCPs)? These are plans that enable us to recover critical functions quickly and simply without having to think about it during an event. These are the backbones to your business’s true resilience. A good BCP is simple, to the point and easy to find. Remember that last point. Your staff must not only know what’s in the BCP, they have to know where is kept (electronically or physically but preferably both). If you or your staff don’t know where the Business Continuity Plans are, it’s useless.

    So, these are the questions we need to be asking ourselves. We know that New Zealand businesses have been slow to pick up on this planning, but it’s this planning that will help you respond and recover most effectively.

    In the case of the Auckland International Convention Centre fire, the planning that was in place was likely focused on the direct facility. People effectively evacuated and thankfully no one was seriously hurt. But what if you’re one of the businesses over the road? What if you’re impacted by someone or something else’s mistake – then what?

    This crisis is more common than you think. 100+ organisations next to the convention centre would vouch for that.

    Contact Us today to learn more

  • CIMS Training for Businesses: A Breakdown

    CIMS Training for Businesses: A Breakdown

    The release of our CIMS 2 & 4 training did not necessarily come from market demand for Emergency Management training or warden training.

    Although this course has always been the most searched for term in the Emergency Management category, Google seldom provides results for corporate and partner training programs.

    A corporate and partner training program is essentially cross-functional and organisational CIMS training. After all, the training is universal, but the collaboration and communication of processes is not.

    It’s this requirement that arose in a conversation we recently had. A client who is currently engaged in a significant, multi-agency project wondered if it’s both easier and affordable to conduct these courses as a group – meaning all parties understand early on how communications should be handled.

    We often see the challenge that organisations go through in encouraging and engaging best practice to less mature third-parties or partners. It’s uncommon that conversations end with any real actionable steps in planning programs as one.

    But it doesn’t have to be this way. The larger the organisations and the more fingers in the pie does not mean basics need to be missed.

    You’ve likely been there; aligning diaries, picking venues, working on objectives & outcomes. It often results in a you putting the task in the too hard basket.

    With our new corporate CIMS program, we do it all for you. Not only can organisations in joint ventures / agreements receive tailored and unique training, they also get the opportunity to be in the same room and agree on a process that works for their situation.

    Our facilitators are seasoned on CIMS, but more so on wider organisational resilience; offering a chance to understand and discuss wider techniques the CIMS model misses. Yes, you’ll get CIMS training, but you’ll get a deeper knowledge of how you should implement it in your day-to-day activities.

    What we do to help

    Taking our above client’s example, we’re able to review and assess the unique situation they’re in, the value of this, and timelines needed.

    Next, we focus on getting the facilitation of the training happening (think location, timescales, getting the relevant people attending etc).  That obviously means we’ll be making the phone calls and ensuring the all parties are prepared.

    Once all of this is agreed, the invoice can be sent to either the key contact/organisation, or it can be split, or paid through an online payment gateway instantly

    We spend time understanding the organisations involved, either over the phone, researching online or reading agreements. This ensures when we’re in a room, we know exactly who sits where.

    During the training, you’ll look at the underpinning principles of CIMS, Legislation that is used in conjunction with CIMS principles, the structure, roles and responsibilities of a CIMS Incident Management team, the scalable and modular nature of CIMS and consistent response documentation that is used across all responding agencies that use CIMS.

    The result

    Simply put, you’re prepared, ready to go, aware and confident. Not only in yourself, but those (often new) partners you’re working with. You all know what processes you’ll useduring an event. That sort of preparedness is priceless.

    If this is of interest and something you think your people will see real value in, contact us to begin.

  • Melbourne Factory Fire

    Melbourne Factory Fire

    In the early morning of April 5th, the Metropolitan Fire brigade were called to an industrial fire at a factory in Campbellfield. What they saw was an out of control inferno with projectiles shooting into the air like rockets. The factory at the centre of this blaze was Bradbury Industrial Services – the Waste business that had its licence suspended this year by the EPA after a failure to clean up its act in March. At the time of the fire, the chemical factory had a stockpile of chemicals almost 3 times the allowable level. Whilst the fire was contained to the premises, it covered Melbourne in a thick blanket of toxic smoke, forcing nearby businesses to evacuate.

    The huge plume of toxic smoke generated by the fire became a health concern to people with breathing problems. Particularly those with heart or lung conditions, including asthma, children under 14 years old, pregnant women and people over 65 years old. The EPA went further to advise people to stay indoors and close doors, windows and vents.

    This fire was likened to the toxic West Footscray fire in August 2018 which took almost a day to control.

    License to operate suspended in March 2019

    The chemical factory had its license suspended in March 2019 due to a failure to comply and rectify issues identified by the EPA. These included:

    • An inspection of the premises found 3 times the amount of material being stored on the premise than it was licensed to store.
    • Storage containers were inadequately labelled.
    • Storage containers being handled outside appropriate areas.

    The chemical factory was allowed to hold a maximum 150,000 litres of material including solvents, inks, paints and other flammable materials – before being processed. At the time of the fire, the factory was storing more than 400,000 litres of the hazardous material. It was almost 3 times the allowed level.

    For residents and businesses in area, the impact was immediate. With reduced access to neighbouring sites and lock down procedures underway, concerns naturally started for the health and wellbeing of people, but quickly moved to economic fallout for the area. The hidden and less talked about impact is how this now affects every industrial business from Perth, to Penrith to Townsville.

    The likely impact on your insurance premiums

    The Campbellfield chemical fire is another critical incident adding to global industrial losses in high hazard areas. The recent Insurance and Business Continuity lifecycle webinar presented by RiskLogic and Aon highlighted the tightening insurance market, with underwriters refusing to insure organisations that are within this high-risk category. Impact of incidents such as these are continuing to evolve the appetite (or there lack of) of insurance companies to underwrite high hazard industrial exposures. This ongoing drop in appetite for industrial hazard risks is likely to spread further than the recycling industry. Organisations that have higher hazard operations including heavy manufacturing, or hazmat exposures are likely to see premiums hike and greater risk retention on a good day and an inability to source insurance terms every other.

    Immediate considerations to prepare for renewal

    Differentiating your risk is key.

    Traditionally underwriters and engineers have largely focussed on Material Damage exposures and risk management strategies, however as underwriters continue to scrutinise risk, the more you’re going to have to differentiate your organisation’s resilience to business interruptions.

    This means getting your business continuity program into the insurer spotlight, providing evidence that:

    1. Your business understands its threat landscape including likely maximum foreseeable loss (MFL) for business interruption
    2. You have robust contingency plans to mitigate that exposure should a catastrophic scenario unfold (i.e. a well documented Business Continuity Plan)
    3. Your leadership and management have experience in testing the validity of its key contingency strategies to recover the business after a major loss (Business continuity scenario testing and exercising).

    Presenting clear evidence of these three elements is going demonstrate your organisation’s attention to managing risk and provide comfort that you’re further up the risk maturity curve than the industry in which you operate – thus differentiating why you’re a safe bet.

    “Being able to provide evidence and confidence to the underwriters during their insurance renewal cycle is going to assist organisations in having an optimal insurance outcome and increase premium savings as they move through their insurance renewal cycle.” advises Marcus Vaughan – Director Growth Strategies at RiskLogic.

    Sources:
    news.com.au
    heraldsun.com.au

  • Emergency and Crisis Management Aged Care sector: a training success story

    Emergency and Crisis Management Aged Care sector: a training success story

    Last month marked the end of an 18-month program that saw RiskLogic, together with First 5 Minutes, train almost 2,000 managers or senior managers in crisis management in the aged care sector. Whilst being well‑versed in emergency management and clinical care, many participants recognised that they weren’t adequately prepared to respond to complex incidents. The program was tailored in partnership with the Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care (Department). The Emergency and Crisis Management Program was prioritised for the aged care sector due in part to the recommendations of the Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety, with the aim to support senior leadership development through targeted training.

    Delivered against the backdrop of declared natural disasters, the training proved timely and relevant for aged care providers preparing for, and responding to, a range of high impact issues. It ensured that if a crisis or emergency situation were to occur, all staff of the facility would be able to respond in a timely manner and provide confident instruction to occupants to get to safety.

    RiskLogic developed a series of short online modules together with group and 1-2-1 mentoring sessions which enabled participants to apply knowledge gained and step through crisis management tools with leading advisors. The program covered areas including, threat environment, crisis management principles, activation of response teams, governance, and critical communications.

    RiskLogic’s analysis of pre/post training survey responses (from almost 2,000 training participants) identified a significant improvement in participants’ emergency and crisis management capability. – DoH

    At the completion of the course 95% of participants rated their understanding of escalation and assessment of emerging crises as either Good or Excellent, displaying a significant shift in understanding and application of tools. The ability to make adequate assessments early enables leadership to establish and maintain control, reducing risks and further impacts to critical operations.

    Participants’ knowledge related to the role of the Governing Body rose from 46% to 93%. The role of the Governing Body, whether a small leadership team or board is critical to managing an emergency or crisis. – RiskLogic

    For many across the targeted sector, this program provided the initial exposure to the key phases, concepts and response strategies related to crisis management. While many organisations are well established in responding to critical incidents, the ability to adequately prepare for and respond to complex emergencies or crises requires further collaboration and development.

    The ability to demonstrate sound understanding of operational and strategic interdependencies like crisis management, crisis communications and business continuity is an asset to any leadership team and a skill set that can be addressed through a tailored industry program such as this.

    Throughout the program, RiskLogic’s proactive and committed approach generated increased participant engagement (amongst an already time-pressed cohort). This was supported by the development of high‑quality, tailored training materials, which helped to deliver tangible improvements in aged care sector emergency/crisis management and preparedness. – DoH

    Many organisations continue to manage the flow on effects from the pandemic, in parallel with workforce continuity stress, and impacts of recent flooding. As the need for adaptation and flexibility rises, organisational resilience has never been more pertinent in establishing support for people, the workplace, and business operations.

    The training program developed for the Department demonstrated our ability to support leadership during difficult times with skills and resources that were immediately implemented.  Consider how we can support your industry in the coming months to build your resilience maturity. Contact RiskLogic now to learn more.